Le 23 juil. 2015 19:27, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> a écrit :
>
> Laurent Laborde wrote:
>
> > Friendly greetings !
> >
> > What's the status of parallel clusterdb please ?
> > I'm having fun (and troubles) applying the vacuumdb patch to clusterdb.
> >
> > This thread also talk about unifying code for parallelizing clusterdb and
> > reindex.
> > Was anything done about it ? Because i can't see it and my work currently
> > involve a lot of copy/pasting from vacuumdb to clusterdb :)
>
> Honestly, I have to wonder whether there are really valid use cases for
> clusterdb. Are you actually using it and want to see it improved, or is
> this just an academical exercise?
Purely academical. I don't use it.
> > And no, (i'm pretty sure) i don't have the required postgresql knowledge to
> > do this unification if it isn't done already.
>
> You may or may not lack it *now*, but that doesn't mean you will
> continue to lack it forever.
That's why i'm working on it :)
--
Laurent "ker2x" Laborde
DBA \o/ gandi.net
