Re: partitioning and identity column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: partitioning and identity column
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5vbvyX7q=KoSCu3GLbzdUMUn36_URaHh5gCiLABF3zBYA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioning and identity column  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 12:04 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ok.  Maybe just rephrase that comment somehow then?
>
> Please see refactoring patches attached to [1]. Refactoring that way
> makes it unnecessary to mention "regular inheritance" in each comment.
> Yet I have included a modified version of the comment in that patch
> set.

Sorry forgot to add the reference. Here it is.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5vz7A-skzt05=4frFx9-VPjfjK4jKQZT7ufRNh4J7=xmQ@mail.gmail.com

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: John Naylor
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Add tuples_skipped to pg_stat_progress_copy