Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5uX1oH3f9WNGJf0E-0C9JFO20EryT0nMN42gfia5rkQLA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Alvaro,


On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 2:49 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Apr-02, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > I have closed the CF entry
> > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/4564/ committed.  I will
> > create another CF entry to park --no-statistics reversal change. That
> > way, we will know when statistics dump/restore has become stable.
>
> No commitfest entry please.  Better to add an open item on the wiki
> page.
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Open_Items

Posted it on the thread where I have reported the bug. Hopefully, we
will commit both the bug fix and test change to enable stats together.

>
>
> > Yes. Few animals that I sampled, the test is finishing pretty early
> > even though it's taking longer than many other tests. But it's not the
> > longest. I also looked at red animals, but none of them report this
> > test to be failing.
>
> Yay.  Still, I don't think this is a reason not to seek a way to
> optimize the test run time in one of the ways we discussed.

yes. Sure.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: statistics import and export: another difference in dump/restore
Next
From: Nazir Bilal Yavuz
Date:
Subject: Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm