> LGTM. > > The commitfest entry is marked as RFC already. > > Thanks for taking care of the comments.
Thanks for reviewing. I noticed a typo "seperate", fixed here.
Thanks for catching it.
Also, I noticed that Robert added an empty line which looks in the source like he's breaking the paragraph -- but because he didn't add a closing </para> and an opening <para> to the next one, there's no actual new paragraph in the HTML output.
My first instinct was to add those. However, upon reading the text, I noticed that the previous paragraph ends without offering an example, and then we attach the example to the paragraph that takes about CREATE TABLE LIKE showing both techniques, which seemed a bit odd. So instead I joined both paragraphs back together. I'm unsure which one looks better. Which one do you vote for?
"CREATE TABLE ... LIKE" is mentioned in a separate paragraph in HEAD as well. The confused me too but I didn't find any reason. Robert just made that explicit by adding a blank line. I thought that was ok. But it makes sense to not have a separate paragraph in the source code too. Thanks for fixing it. I think the intention of the current code as well as the patch is to have a single paragraph in HTML output, same as "no-extra-para" output.
