Re: Getting ERROR with FOR UPDATE/SHARE for partitioned table. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Getting ERROR with FOR UPDATE/SHARE for partitioned table. |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5uO1ePvtcR7Q2JV3r-U1e_5TWe_rB4+sTxPbsAi1r8cEw@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Getting ERROR with FOR UPDATE/SHARE for partitioned table. (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Getting ERROR with FOR UPDATE/SHARE for partitioned table.
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:53 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 9:09 PM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote: > > I tried similar things on inherit partitioning as follow and that looks fine: > > > > DROP TABLE tbl; > > CREATE TABLE tbl (c1 INT,c2 TEXT); > > CREATE TABLE tbl_null(check (c1 is NULL)) INHERITS (tbl); > > CREATE TABLE tbl_1 (check (c1 > 0 and c1 < 4)) INHERITS (tbl); > > INSERT INTO tbl_1 VALUES(generate_series(1,3)); > > > > postgres=# SELECT func(10); > > func > > ------ > > 10 > > (1 row) > > > > On looking further for declarative partition, I found that issue happens only if > > the partitioning pruning enabled, see this: > > > > -- Execute on original set of test case. > > postgres=# ALTER FUNCTION func SET enable_partition_pruning to off; > > ALTER FUNCTION > > > > postgres=# SELECT func(10); > > func > > ------ > > 10 > > (1 row) > > > > I think we need some indication in execCurrentOf() to skip error if the relation > > is pruned. Something like that we already doing for inheriting partitioning, > > see following comment execCurrentOf(): > > > > /* > > * This table didn't produce the cursor's current row; some other > > * inheritance child of the same parent must have. Signal caller to > > * do nothing on this table. > > */ > > Actually, if you declare the cursor without FOR SHARE/UPDATE, the case > would fail even with traditional inheritance: > > drop table if exists p cascade; > create table p (a int); > create table c (check (a = 2)) inherits (p); > insert into p values (1); > insert into c values (2); > begin; > declare c cursor for select * from p where a = 1; > fetch c; > update p set a = a where current of c; > ERROR: cursor "c" is not a simply updatable scan of table "c" > ROLLBACK > > When there are no RowMarks to use because no FOR SHARE/UPDATE clause > was specified when declaring the cursor, execCurrentOf() tries to find > the cursor's current table by looking up its Scan node in the plan > tree but will not find it if it was excluded in the cursor's query. > > With FOR SHARE/UPDATE, it seems to work because the planner delivers > the RowMarks of all the children irrespective of whether or not they > are present in the plan tree itself (something I had complained about > in past [1]). execCurrentOf() doesn't complain as long as there is a > RowMark present even if it's never used. For partitioning, the > planner doesn't make RowMarks for pruned partitions, so > execCurrentOf() can't find one if it's passed a pruned partition's > oid. I am missing something in this explanation. WHERE CURRENT OF works on the row that was last fetched from a cursor. How could a pruned partition's row be fetched and thus cause this error. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
pgsql-hackers by date: