On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 6:48 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 02:43:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > The argument that these only need to be machine-readable doesn't sway
> > me a lot. In the end, any code that is disassembling these strings is
> > going to be written by a human, and the human is a lot more likely to
> > make a mistake about which identifier is which if they're not labeled.
>
> +1. I'm not a robot yet and I still want to be able to parse these
> strings by reading them. As things stand, this code does not allow
> one to understand what each sub-object refers to. We are still in
> beta, let's improve the situation.
Here's a patch fixing it.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
