Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5uCZtk49a1K7ixvASfR0ExFENHhSYVh9VMQHP+TfpqAtQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 5:53 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 1:25 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:11:25AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > > Okay, thanks for the feedback.  We have been relying on diff -u for
> > > the parts of the tests touched by 0001 for some time now, so if there
> > > are no objections I would like to apply 0001 in a couple of days.
> >
> > This part has been applied as 169208092f5c.
>
> Thanks. PFA rebased patches.

PFA rebased patches.

After rebasing I found another bug and reported it at [1].

For the time being I have added --no-statistics to the pg_dump command
when taking a dump for comparison.

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5vf9D+8-a5_BEX3y=2y_xY9hiCxV1=C+FnxDvfprWvkng@mail.gmail.com

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix untranslatable split message
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Statistics Import and Export commit related issue.