Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5tKQ9AGLBWgj7WHoTEGQ8Krw=XWNFhTOyzShJa52DnayA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Responses Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 10:45 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2025-Mar-27, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 6:01 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Couple of minor thoughts:
> > > 1) I felt this error message is not conveying the error message correctly:
> > > +       if ($src_node->pg_version != $dst_node->pg_version
> > > +               or defined $src_node->{_install_path})
> > > +       {
> > > +               fail("same version dump and restore test using default
> > > installation");
> > > +               return;
> > > +       }
> > >
> > > how about something like below:
> > > fail("source and destination nodes must have the same PostgreSQL
> > > version and default installation paths");
> >
> > The text in ok(), fail() etc. are test names and not error messages.
> > See [1]. Your suggestion and other versions that I came up with became
> > too verbose to be test names. So I think the text here is compromise
> > between conveying enough information and not being too long. We
> > usually have to pick the testname and lookup the test code to
> > investigate the failure. This text serves that purpose.
>
> Maybe
> fail("roundtrip dump/restore of the regression database")

No, that's losing some information like default installation and the
same version.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Reducing memory consumed by RestrictInfo list translations in partitionwise join planning
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel heap vacuum