On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 10:41 AM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2025-03-27 at 17:07 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> > Pulled the latest sources but the test is still failing with the same
> > differences.
>
> The attached set of patches (your 0001 and 0002, combined with my patch
> v2j-0003) applied on master (058b5152f0) are passing the pg_upgrade
> test suite for me.
>
> Are you saying that the tests don't work for you even when v2j-0003 is
> applied? Or are you saying that your tests are failing on master, and
> that v2j-0002 should be committed?
When I applied v1 it didn't pass.
But applying v2j-0003, the test passes.
I don't think I understand the patch fully. But I have a comment.
+ * However, the section may be updated later for materialized views.
+ * Matview stats depend on the matview data, because REFRESH
+ * MATERIALIZED VIEW replaces the storage and resets the stats, and
+ * the matview data is in SECTION_POST_DATA. Also, the materialized
+ * SECTION_POST_DATA to resolve some kinds of dependency problems (see
+ * repairMatViewBoundaryMultiLoop()).
+ */
It feels like we can simplify this as: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW
replaces storage and resets the stats hence the Matview stats should
be printed after printing REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW command in
SECTION_POST_DATA. Also the materialized view ... . Hence the section
may be updated later for materialized views.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat