Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5spqUbAzqgZD3E3+4Gz7pE2HDeXrY1BG5KGpdHeWr0_6g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size  (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: more descriptive message for process termination due to max_slot_wal_keep_size
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 9:35 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> As complained in pgsql-bugs [1], when a process is terminated due to
> max_slot_wal_keep_size, the related messages don't mention the root
> cause for *the termination*.  Note that the third message does not
> show for temporary replication slots.
>
> [pid=a] LOG:  terminating process x to release replication slot "s"
> [pid=x] LOG:  FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command
> [pid=a] LOG:  invalidting slot "s" because its restart_lsn X/X exceeds max_slot_wal_keep_size
>
> The attached patch attaches a DETAIL line to the first message.
>
> > [17605] LOG:  terminating process 17614 to release replication slot "s1"
> + [17605] DETAIL:  The slot's restart_lsn 0/2C0000A0 exceeds max_slot_wal_keep_size.
> > [17614] FATAL:  terminating connection due to administrator command
> > [17605] LOG:  invalidating slot "s1" because its restart_lsn 0/2C0000A0 exceeds max_slot_wal_keep_size
>
> Somewhat the second and fourth lines look inconsistent each other but
> that wouldn't be such a problem.  I don't think we want to concatenate
> the two lines together as the result is a bit too long.
>
> > LOG:  terminating process 17614 to release replication slot "s1" because it's restart_lsn 0/2C0000A0 exceeds
max_slot_wal_keep_size.
>
> What do you think about this?

Agree. I think we should also specify the restart_lsn value which
would be within max_slot_wal_keep_size for better understanding.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Confused comment about drop replica identity index
Next
From: Mikael Kjellström
Date:
Subject: Re: conchuela has some SSL issues