Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm forpartition-wise join
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5siu-ynNAai-kV0xrWFCtwn-LbgD_dv6vQKLBGvQ_mzAg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:14 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 20:44, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> In that case, we really should add the PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY to make
> >> the compiler happy.
>
> > Attaching my patch again. It doesn't need PG_USED_FOR_ASSERTS_ONLY as well.
> > Kuntal has confirmed that this fixes the warning for him.
>
> I see no patch here ...
>

Sorry. Here it is


-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: where should I stick that backup?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join