Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5sT4u0OGf0Ckx63XHUnyMYsbBKnoGpNVPK6+WNS58BCPw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 7:28 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>
> On 20.11.25 16:00, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> >> 5.
> >>
> >> src/backend/catalog/sql_features.txt
> >>
> >> +G034 Path concatenation YES SQL/PGQ required
> >>
> >> Do we support path concatenation?
> > I don't think so. But let Peter confirm it.
>
> AFAICT, path concatenation just allows that you can write multiple
> element patterns in a row, like ()-[]->().  I don't see how it could
> make sense to not support that.

Ah! I confused path concatenation with either path pattern list or
path pattern multiset alternation. Sorry.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow GUC settings in CREATE SUBSCRIPTION CONNECTION to take effect
Next
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication