Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5sBeEzP_5Y9tzKdna7W_stnjvuip=5GyE+LRiNFo2ebMA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using failover slots for PG-non_PG logical replication  (shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have split your top up patch into 2 - one related to the document
> > change being the subject of this thread and the other for fixing the
> > query. Committer may squash the patch, if they think so.
> >
>
> The changes look good to me.

Thanks.

Looks like Amit has already committed it. I had  created a CF entry
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5904/ to track this.  I will
mark it as committed now.

Amit,
While reviewing the patches again, I felt that the second sentence in
that section also needs a bit of clarification. Here's patch with that
change. Please feel free to reject it or apply it.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve tab completion for COPY
Next
From: Nisha Moond
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication