Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ashutosh Bapat
Subject Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Date
Msg-id CAExHW5s5YN3rEi1JOEaa-7FPdkAYJv_jG67SO28n-On6FW6KAQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits  (Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 2:23 PM Maxim Orlov <orlovmg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2025 at 16:17, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> One more thing,
>> An UPDATE waits for FOR SHARE query to finish, and vice versa. In my
>> experiments I didn't see an UPDATE creating a multi-xact. Why do we
>> have UPDATEs in the load created by the test? Am I missing something?
>
>
> As far as I remember, this was done on purpose to create different
> multixact members statuses randomly.

In that case, better to include that in the comments.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: Migrate to autoconf 2.72?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server