Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Ashutosh Bapat |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Date | |
Msg-id | CAExHW5s0bJtyy-=mWy_WgoSY66KAdrEXUgDoEgS2J7xJrAp92A@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
List | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Vignesh, Some review comments on 0001 On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 11:17 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > The changes for the same are available int the v5 patch available at [1]. > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm3wCf0YcvVo%2BgHMGpupk9K6WKJxCyLUvhPC2GkPKRZUWA%40mail.gmail.com > cb->truncate_cb = pg_decode_truncate; cb->commit_cb = pg_decode_commit_txn; cb->filter_by_origin_cb = pg_decode_filter; + cb->filter_remote_origin_cb = pg_decode_filter_remote_origin; Why do we need a new hook? Can we use filter_by_origin_cb? Also it looks like implementation of pg_decode_filter and pg_decode_filter_remote_origin is same, unless my eyes are deceiving me. - <literal>binary</literal>, <literal>streaming</literal>, and - <literal>disable_on_error</literal>. + <literal>binary</literal>, <literal>streaming</literal>, + <literal>disable_on_error</literal> and + <literal>publish_local_only</literal>. "publish_local_only" as a "subscription" option looks odd. Should it be "subscribe_local_only"? + <varlistentry> + <term><literal>publish_local_only</literal> (<type>boolean</type>)</term> + <listitem> + <para> + Specifies whether the subscription should subscribe only to the + locally generated changes or subscribe to both the locally generated + changes and the replicated changes that was generated from other + nodes in the publisher. The default is <literal>false</literal>. This description to uses verb "subscribe" instead of "publish". @@ -936,6 +951,13 @@ AlterSubscription(ParseState *pstate, AlterSubscriptionStmt *stmt, = true; } + if (IsSet(opts.specified_opts, SUBOPT_PUBLISH_LOCAL_ONLY)) + { + values[Anum_pg_subscription_sublocal - 1] = + BoolGetDatum(opts.streaming); should this be opts.sublocal? cb->commit_prepared_cb = pgoutput_commit_prepared_txn; cb->rollback_prepared_cb = pgoutput_rollback_prepared_txn; cb->filter_by_origin_cb = pgoutput_origin_filter; + cb->filter_remote_origin_cb = pgoutput_remote_origin_filter; pgoutput_origin_filter just returns false now. I think we should just enhance that function and reuse the callback, instead of adding a new callback. --- a/src/include/replication/logical.h +++ b/src/include/replication/logical.h @@ -99,6 +99,8 @@ typedef struct LogicalDecodingContext */ bool twophase_opt_given; + bool only_local; /* publish only locally generated data */ + If we get rid of the new callback, we won't need this new member as well. Anyway the filtering happens within the output plugin. There is nothing that core is required to do here. --- a/src/include/replication/walreceiver.h +++ b/src/include/replication/walreceiver.h @@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ typedef struct bool streaming; /* Streaming of large transactions */ bool twophase; /* Streaming of two-phase transactions at * prepare time */ + bool only_local; /* publish only locally generated data */ Are we using this anywhere. I couldn't spot any usage of this member. I might be missing something though. -- Best Wishes, Ashutosh Bapat
pgsql-hackers by date: