Re: Use log_newpage_range in HASH index build - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From lakshmi
Subject Re: Use log_newpage_range in HASH index build
Date
Msg-id CAEvyyThYHLTqQP7mebf=9C7EBSNJ6mMsrtvEmhbtDub3KQ0w4w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: Use log_newpage_range in HASH index build  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers

Hi,

It is probably best to start a separate email thread specifically
about this patch, because it's doing something quite different from
the original patch. I suggest presenting some specific performance
results, as it's not very clear how much benefit this might have. It
might be good to test a favorable scenario and also an unfavorable
scenario, describing and showing results for each.


 

Thanks for the suggestion. I’ll start a separate thread for this patch with performance results.

Regards,
Lakshmi

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
Date:
Subject: Re: [Patch]: Fix excessive ProcArrayLock acquisitions with subscription max_retention_duration=0
Next
From: Alexander Lakhin
Date:
Subject: Re: Startup process deadlock: WaitForProcSignalBarriers vs aux process