Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ranier Vilela
Subject Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II)
Date
Msg-id CAEudQAr=f+_6Vja8vFE8+pZ9ppQXwtgXcLTTcRv37wch5oHVgw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Small miscellaneus fixes (Part II)  (John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Em ter., 17 de jan. de 2023 às 04:37, John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> escreveu:

On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 1:28 PM John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
>
> I wrote:
> > ...but arguably the earlier check is close enough that it's silly to assert in the "else" branch, and I'd be okay with just nuking those lines. Another thing that caught my attention is the assumption that unsetting a bit is so expensive that we have to first check if it's set, so we may as well remove "IS_BRACKET(Np->Num)" as well.
>
> The attached is what I mean. I'll commit this this week unless there are objections.

I've pushed this and the cosmetic fix in pg_dump. Those were the only things I saw that had some interest, so I closed the CF entry.
Thanks for the commits.

regards,
Ranier Vilela

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Helper functions for wait_for_catchup() in Cluster.pm
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: xml2: add test for coverage