Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ranier Vilela
Subject Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
Date
Msg-id CAEudQAqh6vn8WyL7MFULCOca08ZVEwTsgUFzP_OXvseYC7Uwkw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Signed vs Unsigned (take 2) (src/backend/storage/ipc/procarray.c)
List pgsql-hackers
Em seg., 14 de jun. de 2021 às 21:01, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:
I took it a step further.

Transactions

HEAD                      patched
10002207                10586781
10146167                10388685
10048919                10333359
10065764,3333333 10436275                 3,55021946687555

TPS
HEAD                       patched
33469,016009         35399,010472
33950,624679         34733,252336
33639,8429             34578,495043
33686,4945293333 34903,5859503333 3,48700968070122

3,55% Is it worth touch procarray.c for real?

With msvc 64 bits, the asm generated:
HEAD
213.731 bytes procarray.asm
patched
212.035 bytes procarray.asm

Patch attached.

regards,
Ranier Vilela

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix buffer not null terminated on (ecpg lib)
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety