Em ter., 20 de jul. de 2021 às 11:15, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> escreveu:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2021 at 10:04, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> wrote: > Perhaps you would agree with me that in the most absolute of times, malloc will not fail. > So it makes more sense to test: > if (ret != NULL) > than > if (ret == NULL)
I think it'd be better to use unlikely() for that.
Sure, it can be, but in this case, there is no way to reduce the scope.
