Em qua., 12 de fev. de 2025 às 00:54, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 01:32:32PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote: > There is no bug. They are the same behind the scenes. I'm fine changing it. It > is a new code and it wouldn't cause a lot of pain to backpatch patches in the > future.
On consistency grounds, and as this is documented in fe-exec.c at the top of PQfreemem(), I can get behind the switch.
> Even if the pg_createsubscriber aims to run in a small amount of time, hence, > it is fine to leak memory, the initial commit cleaned up all variables but a > subsequent commit 4867f8a555c apparently didn't. Although it is just a low > impact improvement, it is better to be strict and shut up SASTs.
check_and_drop_existing_subscriptions() is called once per database in setup_subscriber(), and we are not going to have millions of them in this list. We don't usually care for such short-lived things, but as the original commit did the effort in d44032d01463, I don't see why we cannot do it here, either.
