Re: stats and unix sockets - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Greg Spiegelberg
Subject Re: stats and unix sockets
Date
Msg-id CAEtnbpUwTMUPfSKKiVxs7ZBx-1wWMO6ru-6dggTMMsqB90geTQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: stats and unix sockets  (Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.sera@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: stats and unix sockets  (Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.sera@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Bèrto ëd Sèra <berto.d.sera@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
 
That's a pretty stupid requirement.  The stats collector socket is bound
to itself, so it's inaccessible from anywhere else (on machine or off)
regardless of firewall settings.  There's no need to worry about it,
and no there is not a provision for doing it via unix socket instead.

Indeed it is a totally harmless thing and the request makes little (if any) sense. I will pass the answer over and I do share your stance regarding excess in paranoid modes :)


Can you create a virtual network interface, assign an address to it and have PostgreSQL listen to it in addition to the socket?  I'm thinking not the eth0:X type but potentially what VirtualBox (vboxnet0), VMware (vmnet0) or other virtualization products do using brctl.

Greg

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Bèrto ëd Sèra
Date:
Subject: Re: stats and unix sockets
Next
From: Bèrto ëd Sèra
Date:
Subject: Re: stats and unix sockets