Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=3zS1_FB0zCcLYXtcaLNpX1P+Q6_A8=J-jk64pnFassQg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 4:12 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Can you come up with an halfway realistic scenario why an index oid, not
> a table, constraint, sequence oid, would be relied upon?

Is there an implication for SIREAD locks?  Predicate locks on index
pages include the index OID in the tag.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Append implementation
Next
From: Jan Michálek
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Other formats in pset like markdown, rst, mediawiki