Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=3u_A5xR1hLe9GJV-9c+dSvmu5vDC6VMHYRj42c3pS=zA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 10:39 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> Tom, do you want to double-check that this fixes it for you?
>>
>> I can confirm that a valgrind run succeeded for me with the patch
>> in place.
>
> Committed.  Sorry for the delay.

FYI I'm planning to look into adding a valgrind check to the
commitfest CI thing I run so we can catch these earlier without
committer involvement.  It's super slow because of all those pesky
regression tests so I'll probably need to improve the scheduling logic
a bit to make it useful first (prioritising new patches or something,
since otherwise it'll take up to multiple days to get around to
valgrind-testing any given patch...).

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Luke Cowell
Date:
Subject: Re: Possible performance regression with pg_dump of a large number ofrelations
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0