On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> wrote:
>>> We just had a customer hit this issue. I kind of wonder whether this
>>> shouldn't be backpatched: Currently the execution on the primary is
>>> O(NBuffers * log(ndrels)) whereas it's O(NBuffers * ndrels) on the
>>> standby - with a lot higher constants to boot. That means it's very
>>> easy to get into situations where the standy starts to lag behind very
>>> significantly.
>>
>> +1, we faced with that too
>
> +1 to back-patch. As Horiguchi-san pointed out, this is basically
> the fix for oversight of commit 279628a0a7, not new feature.
+1
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
