On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-06-23 13:00:43 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I looked at this again and noticed a few problems. I've attached a
> > new version.
>
> My re-reading of the discussion is to commit this to master? I'll do
> that unless somebody protests.
>
What about 9.5? I thought the idea was not to change preexisting rules in
back branches because of compatibility problems with existing data that
users may have indexed/stored, but 9.5 obviously can't have that problem
yet.
> To me it seems like a good idea to include the generation script
> somewhere? Unicode isn't all that static.
>
+1
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
