Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2ubiu2tWBXgfeiDJuiBnzUtDbdmkE+0PSbn4MzopYfJQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Previous patch has bug around GUC parameter handling.
> Attached updated version.

I spotted a couple of typos:

+    used.  Priority is given to servers in the order that the appear
in the list.

s/the appear/they appear/

-    The minimum wait time is the roundtrip time between primary to standby.
+    The minimum wait time is the roundtrip time between the primary and the
+    almost synchronous standby.

s/almost/slowest/

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench small bug fix
Next
From: Kevin Grittner
Date:
Subject: Re: snapshot too old, configured by time