Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2TE57wSEDCzynFjSi9_wh_ewTdUdiWCW11bMk1+0HMng@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] recent deadlock regression test failures  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Apr 8, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I'm imagining an API like
>>>      isolation_test_is_waiting_for(int, int[]) returns bool
>
>> Good suggestion.
>
>> Thomas, would you like to produce a patch along these lines, or
>> should I?
>
> I'll be happy to review/push if someone else does a first draft.

Ok, I'll post a new patch tomorrow.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Banck
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Create replication slot in pg_basebackup if requestedand not yet present
Next
From: Andreas Seltenreich
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] [sqlsmith] ERROR: badly formatted node string "RESTRICTINFO...