Re: [PATCH v19] GSSAPI encryption support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [PATCH v19] GSSAPI encryption support
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2EQgjRTo4vxCzziwQ_R0UnExPpXcfz7_eY2J4t7mbc-Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH v19] GSSAPI encryption support  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 10:20 AM Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> (and I have to wonder- if we want nearly all callers of
> WaitLatch/WaitLatchOrSocket to use WL_EXIT_ON_PM_DEATH, maybe we should
> make that the default and allow it to be overridden..? ...

That is what I proposed.  It was Heikki who talked me into the opt-in
solution, but using an assertion to make sure you handle it one way or
the other:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6417314e-93d5-ed2d-9012-8d6e9ed21778%40iki.fi

Perhaps I should have sought more opinions.  Please feel free to start
a new thread on that if you don't like the way it was done.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19] GSSAPI encryption support
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: don't mark indexes invalid unnecessarily