Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=25q3m-7p5q+NpHzgbVP5cvRwujC+YxRZQ=2DXyvFLPnA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Here is a first pass at that. [...]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> file_fdw is parallel-safe, ...

And here is a patch to apply on top of the last one, to make file_fdw
return true.  But does it really work correctly under parallelism?

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning