Re: WIP: Barriers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: WIP: Barriers
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=2-=nF80oe7btPgNiNBsG2QLe4ZtpqZ7T5AZQfkNVKiBg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WIP: Barriers  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: WIP: Barriers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> If we're going to remove barrier.h, I think that should be a separate
>>> commit from creating a new barrier.h.
>>
>> OK.  Here's a patch to remove the old header, and the v2 barrier patch
>> which adds phases and attach/detach.  As before, it depends on
>> condition-variable-v2.patch.
>
> Here's a new version which is rebased and adds support for passing
> wait_event through to pg_stat_activity.

Here's a version updated for the new conditional variables interface
which has just been committed as e8ac886c.  Some comments improved.

--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reload SSL certificates on SIGHUP