[HACKERS] Size vs size_t - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject [HACKERS] Size vs size_t
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=1eA0vsgA7-2oigKzqg10YeXoPWiS-fCuQRDLwwmgMXag@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Size vs size_t  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

Noticing that the assembled hackers don't seem to agree on $SUBJECT in
new patches, I decided to plot counts of lines matching \<Size\> and
\<size_t\> over time.  After a very long run in the lead, size_t has
recently been left in the dust by Size.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] asynchronous execution
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSOC - TOAST'ing in slices