Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=19UberfCpdi5QejE7npuOUtewWdmdr+LSEqR8bXHd+cQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Inadequate infrastructure for NextValueExpr
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> [...]
> T_NamedTuplestoreScan can be produced by outfuncs.c with tagname
> NAMEDTUPLESTORESCAN but that tagname is not recognized by readfuncs.c
> [...]
>
> That revealed a defect in commit
> 18ce3a4ab22d2984f8540ab480979c851dae5338 which I think should be
> corrected with something like the attached, though I'm not sure if
> it's possible to reach it.

Adding Kevin and Andrew G.  Thoughts on whether this is a defect that
should be corrected with something like
read-namedtuplestorescan.patch?

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw bug in 9.6