Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=1+HZfOzK0xrNQjJH=ZN=LZHZxKHZ5Pz86i_LCq=PSMAg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel Hash take II  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>> WRT the main patch:
>
> Thanks for the review.  I will respond soon, but for now I just wanted
> to post a rebased version (no changes) because v16 no longer applies.

Rebased with better commit messages.  Sorry for the changed patch
names, I switched to using git-format properly...  (I'll be posting a
new version with some bigger changes to the 0010 patch and some
answers to good questions you've asked soon.)

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem