Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=0_oU0FU-fgg+PFp+b7VqwQ9UWbY-ydfuvuJCrvEYfP+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Generally speaking, we don't throw
>> serialization errors today at READ COMMITTED, so if we do so here,
>> that's going to be a noticeable and perhaps unwelcome change.
>
> Yes we do:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/transaction-iso.html#XACT-REPEATABLE-READ

Oops -- please ignore, I misread that as repeatable read.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] UPDATE of partition key
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should we cacheline align PGXACT?