Re: Updating parallel.sgml's treatment of parallel joins - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Updating parallel.sgml's treatment of parallel joins
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=0Jij=KrXgSgUj63PTf0iAposr4NZzyb1zH1hq12AX5-A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Updating parallel.sgml's treatment of parallel joins  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 10:30 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Here is an attempt at updating parallel.sgml to cover Parallel Hash.
>> I will be neither surprised nor offended if Robert would like to put
>> it differently!
>
> Looks nice.  Committed.

Thanks.

One thing that is slightly odd about that page[1] is that some places
use the style "<emphasis>parallel sequential scan</emphasis>" (lower
case, emphasis on first mention, head noun = "scan" or "join") and
other places use the style "<literal>Partial Aggregate</literal> node"
(title case, fixed width typeface, head noun = "node").

I think that page also needs a new <sect2> for "Parallel Append".
Perhaps the authors of commit ab727167 would like to write a patch for
that?  I'll be interested to see which style they go for...

[1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/parallel-plans.html

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Edmund Horner
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix for pg_stat_activity putting client hostaddr into appname field
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Vacuum: Update FSM more frequently