Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=0Aw_X72v+9crQTyf-TLoJ+jd1pY6RPT-jrDzAOQSXPbg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Transition tables vs ON CONFLICT  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>>> I suppose you'll need two tuplestores for the ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
>>> case -- one for updated tuples, and the other for inserted tuples.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Here is a patch implementing the above.  It should be applied on top
>> of transition-tuples-from-wctes-v2.patch[2].
>
> Here's a new version of patch #3.

That accidentally removed a comment that I wanted to keep.  Here is a
better version.

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] standby server crashes hard on out-of-disk-space in HEAD
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] standby server crashes hard on out-of-disk-space inHEAD