> Looking for and improving test coverage for RLS is a good suggestion,
> but let's not link the fate of the issue reported here with this
> requirement. I have spent some time looking at this patch and this
> looks in rather good shape to me (you even remembered to use the
> prefix regress_* for the role name that you are adding!). So I have
> marked this bug fix as ready for committer.
Excellent, thanks for the review and feedback. I appreciate it.
-Adam
