Re: Greatest Common Divisor - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCWU+heV6ScwLDco33jiBkHZsZWkRVNGR5OeQPU+zpxawA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Greatest Common Divisor  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Greatest Common Divisor  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 12:31, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> > Do we actually need the smallint versions of these functions?
>
> Doubt it.  It'd be fairly hard even to call those, since e.g. "42"
> is an int not a smallint.
>

I see this has been marked RFC. I'll take it, and barring objections,
I'll start by ripping out the smallint code.

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: david.turon@linuxbox.cz
Date:
Subject: Re: empty range
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: base backup client as auxiliary backend process