On Thu, 4 Sept 2025 at 01:18, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> I'd be pretty much OK with this version of the patch, plus a few
> tweaks.
Agreed.
In numeric_div_safe():
+div_error:
+ ereturn(escontext, NULL,
+ errcode(ERRCODE_DIVISION_BY_ZERO),
+ errmsg("division by zero"));
I would make that label something more specific like "division_by_zero".
> Dean, you have commented on this patch before me and the numeric code
> is something you have touched more than me lately (the LSN part is
> tainted with my fingerprints, but it's minimal here). Would you
> prefer handle this patch yourself? I'm OK to perform a final lookup
> of it for commit, just won't get in your way if you have been looking
> at it seriously.
I don't mind. I haven't looked at it too closely, but I'm broadly
happy with it. I think any issues are probably now minor cosmetic
things, so if you've been looking in more detail and are happy to
commit it, then go ahead. Otherwise, I can take it if you prefer.
Regards,
Dean
