Re: Greatest Common Divisor - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: Greatest Common Divisor
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCVYfH3eGLtLonriE1dSFMmr-4p0jre7VRYaYM2bQ0hZzg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Greatest Common Divisor  (Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 18:52, Vik Fearing <vik.fearing@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On 20/01/2020 11:28, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> >
> > +       <entry>
> > +        least common multiple — the smallest strictly positive number
> > +        that is an integer multiple of both inputs; returns
> > <literal>0</literal>
> > +        if either input is zero
> > +       </entry>
>
> In that case should lcm be "...that is an integral multiple..." since
> the numeric version will return numeric?
>

So "integral multiple" instead of "integer multiple"? I think I'm more
used to the latter, but I'm happy with either.

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Increase psql's password buffer size
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Online checksums patch - once again