On 8 December 2012 15:21, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Continuing to work on this ... I found multiple things I didn't like
> about the permission-field update code. Attached are some heavily
> commented extracts from the code as I've changed it. Does anybody
> object to either the code or the objectives given in the comments?
Thanks for looking at this. The new, adjusted code looks good to me.
Regards,
Dean