Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_XRXFTFpsA4rAebf7zZ-BmTCRRejb-HRHQtoy78W2a26w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Reduced power consumption in autovacuum launcher process
List pgsql-hackers
On 10 August 2011 01:35, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Actually, I'm nearly done with it already.  Perhaps you could start
> thinking about the other polling loops.

Fair enough. I'm slightly surprised that there doesn't need to be some
bikeshedding about my idea to treat the PGPROC latch as the generic,
per-process latch.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: augmenting MultiXacts to improve foreign keys
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Enforcing that all WAL has been replayed after restoring from backup