On 4 January 2013 18:07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Exactly. To my mind, the *entire* point of this patch is to remove the
> need for people to try to dig information out of potentially-localized
> message strings. It's not clear to me that we have to strain to provide
> information that isn't in the currently-reported messages --- we are
> only trying to make it easier for client-side code to extract the
> information it's likely to need.
It seems that we're in agreement, then. I'll prepare a version of the
patch very similar to the one I previously posted, but with some
caveats about how reliably the values can be used. I think that that
should be fine.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
