Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_WMQCYfKPPBsXErzih-WEfwX4aqFjVBstPurbaewqYKBw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC][PATCH] wal decoding, attempt #2 - Design Documents (really attached)  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 18 October 2012 16:18, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com> wrote:
> A "shim" adds complexity, but retains the "upgrade across versions"
> use case, and reduces the need to keep supporting elder versions of
> Slony.

Right. Upgrading across major versions is likely to continue to remain
a very important use-case for Slony.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: First draft of snapshot snapshot building design document
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_dump: Sort overloaded functions in deterministic order