Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s?
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_W0FgHQaU45d=BGs7QXaeXEPaGPg2+Jmzh65x0eEweDFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s?  (Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> wrote:
> What Postgres version? The WAL Writer will hibernate on Postgres 9.2+.

Of course, it will still write things out at a steady rate if they're
there to write. However, there is no reason to think you couldn't
change things in guc.c to have the upper bound increased. You might
even propose a patch to do so.


--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is wal_writer_delay limited to 10s?
Next
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Transparent exchange BDE from Oracle to PostgreSQL