Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_VW-Yjtwyy5+P2QN-V1FX0ar6Hkm296+Ae8zMrNk1csmQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.  (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
List pgsql-hackers
On 9 May 2012 00:21, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Yes, there is some checking of flags before the potential ResetLatch()
> call, which may be acted on. The code there is almost identical to
> that of the extant bgwriter code. I was under the impression that this
> did not amount to a race, though it's rather late now, and I'm feeling
> under the weather, so I have not taken steps to verify that I have it
> right. Arguably, you'd want somebody's SetLatch call to be ignored if

Sent too early. That should be: Arguably, you'd want somebody's
SetLatch call to be ignored under the circumstances that that could
happen in both the bgwriter, and the WALWriter within my recent patch.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: age(xid) on hot standby