On 29 December 2012 21:24, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> can we remove CONSTRAINT_NAME from this patch? Minimally TABLE_SCHEMA,
> TABLE_NAME and COLUMN_NAME works as expected.
>
> CONSTRAINT_NAME can be implemented after constraints refactoring
This patch is almost completely pointless without a CONSTRAINT_NAME field.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
