Re: Rethinking placement of latch self-pipe initialization - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Rethinking placement of latch self-pipe initialization
Date
Msg-id CAEYLb_UQcDcLbfA1hD6cURLfO-4gFr-Q2SLRQWHnhZZNbSKufw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking placement of latch self-pipe initialization  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 14 October 2012 19:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Anyway, the simplest working solution proved to be to put the
> InitializeLatchSupport calls in InitProcess and InitAuxiliaryProcess,
> plus add them in a few background process types that use InitLatch but
> don't call either of those functions.  Patch attached.  Any objections?

Looks good to me.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Rethinking placement of latch self-pipe initialization
Next
From: Stirling Newberry
Date:
Subject: Re: Deprecating RULES