Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Junwang Zhao
Subject Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date
Msg-id CAEG8a3KsM_7qgEzbwCbwatZpoWVsXyR_G_GNYiqqnn-AJ8ASwQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 5:54 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 12:05 PM Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Andrew mentioned in the SQL/PGQ commit thread that we should
> > > > fence the dependency check in pg_dump.c, maybe collecting it
> > > > in your patch set, see:
> > > >
> > > > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/192197/fix-propgraph-def.patch
> > >
> > > Can you please share the link to the message? This is an attachment
> > > without message context.
> >
> > here
> >
> > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/afe3f099-3271-4fc4-8e32-467b5309affb%40dunslane.net
>
> Thanks Junwang.
>
> I see that without Andrew's patch the upgrade from an old cluster fails with
> pg_dump: error: query failed: ERROR:  relation "pg_propgraph_element"
> does not exist
> LINE 7: ..., refclassid, refobjid, deptype FROM pg_depend d, pg_propgra...
>
> The error is fixed by Andrew's changes. But the patch is already
> committed by Peter.

Ok, then the patch set LGTM.

>
> --
> Best Wishes,
> Ashutosh Bapat



--
Regards
Junwang Zhao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Matsumura, Ryo/松村 量
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: clarify default values of EXPLAIN BUFFERS and SERIALIZE
Next
From: "Jelte Fennema-Nio"
Date:
Subject: Re: Don't use the deprecated and insecure PQcancel in our frontend tools anymore