Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bernice Southey
Subject Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations
Date
Msg-id CAEDh4nzOtPrpqzh8mkbthP=4UNNSaj4mHTjHZ7c+fLEikfM2fQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> No, that's not part of the proposal.  The one case in which we'd
> complain (at an error level TBD) is if a temp table is used to
> define an old-style function's argument or result type
Thank you, I see I was being an idiot.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread